Cochineal Husbandry in Eighteenth-Century Mexico and India

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary
During the eighteenth-century, the Spanish Empire held a virtual monopoly on the production of cochineal, a lucrative red dye commodity sourced from insects grown on cacti largely in the south of modern day Mexico. The cochineal insect had been domesticated and grown by the indigenous peoples of central America for centuries before the arrival of the Spanish. It was widely known as ‘nocheztli’ or ‘blood of the nopal cactus’. Cochineal was situated in a cultural matrix which influenced the insects’ complex husbandry and development as a domesticated species in southern Mexico. In the late eighteenth-century the British East India Company attempted to turn southern India and Bengal into production zones for cochineal (Fray, 2012). In making India a major producer of cochineal the Company hoped to turn a substantial profit and break the Spanish monopoly. British promoters of this scheme assumed similarities between India and Mexico in areas of landscape, peoples, cultures, plants and insects. Critically British colonial promoters believed the landscapes and indigenous peoples of southern Mexico would be interchangeable with the landscapes and peoples of southern India and Bengal. These assumptions led to the failure of the project. Even in Guatemala, geographically next to Mexico, the cochineal industry had been impossible to transport until native Oaxacan cochineal growers had accompanied their insects and taught methods of husbandry. The movement of the cochineal industry to Guatemala in a similar time period offers a contrast to the failed British project in India.
Abstract ID :
HSS875
Submission Type
Abstract Topics
Chronological Classification :
Cultural and cross-cultural contexts, including colonialism in general
Self-Designated Keywords :
Cochineal insects, history of entomology, indigenous technologies, climate

Associated Sessions

Harvard University

Abstracts With Same Type

Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
HSS661022
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Christian Flow
HSS884
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Mr. Eoin Carter
HSS231024
Tools for Historians of Science
Contributed Paper
Susanna Bloem
HSS567
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Dr. Sean Hsiang-lin Lei
HSS187
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Jiemin Tina Wei
94 visits