"More French Than the French": John Herschel and Musical Standardization in Nineteenth-Century France and Britain

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary
Between 1858 and 1859, Emperor Napoleon III’s government determined a national pitch to which musicians should tune their instruments. The following year, the British Society of Arts attempted to emulate this standard. Amid tense Anglo-French relations, however, British audiences interpreted the French pitch as a measure of the country’s political autocracy. As a result, British mathematicians attempted to mobilise nature itself as a resource in redefining what musical standard Britain should adopt, but this raised profound concerns over the cultural authority of those with scientific credentials. Through the controversy of standardizing musical pitch during the 1850s, this paper explores how these ambiguities over cultural authority shaped disagreements between instrument makers, musicians, and mathematicians. From the late-1850s, discussions over the regulation of musical pitch revealed that while natural philosophy and mathematics might provide acoustic knowledge, they could exert little influence over music itself. For musical practice, standardization, that most essential of Victorian scientific concerns, remained firmly in the hands of musical communities. Pitch was, in effect, the measure of science’s limits. While controversies over standards for electricity, heat, and time were resolved in the laboratory and observatory, a standard for music remained elusive. Despite John Herschel’s campaign for a standard C of 512 vibrations, which he claimed had mathematical credentials, it was Britain’s musical elites who determined how the nation’s music would be ordered.
Abstract ID :
HSS134
Submission Type
Abstract Topics
Chronological Classification :
19th century
Self-Designated Keywords :
Measurement, standards, sound, music, mathematics, Herschel, instrumentation, politics, Victorian
University of Cambridge

Abstracts With Same Type

Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
HSS661022
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Christian Flow
HSS884
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Mr. Eoin Carter
HSS231024
Tools for Historians of Science
Contributed Paper
Susanna Bloem
HSS567
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Dr. Sean Hsiang-lin Lei
HSS187
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Jiemin Tina Wei
HSS561027
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Laura Volkmer
255 visits