Disability Materiality

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary
As Katherine Ott has asserted, disability is “unique in the extent to which it is bonded with technology, tools, and machines as a medium of social interaction.” Objects used by, and made for, disabled people serve as tangible evidence of lived experiences of disability—the constraints of medicine, the limits and expansions of technology, and shifting aspects of identity, self-representation, and stigma. These objects also define and shape social and medical meanings of “disabled” and “abled” as much as the relationship between innovation and commercialization. Furthermore, as scholars of material culture have emphasized, object biographies—especially of neglected artefacts—can dictate patterns in larger historical trends. Focusing on hearing prosthetics, this paper examines how material culture and the history of medicine provide methodological approaches for understanding neglected and nuanced histories of disability.
Abstract ID :
HSS341023
Submission Type
Abstract Topics
University of Delaware

Abstracts With Same Type

Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
HSS661022
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Christian Flow
HSS884
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Mr. Eoin Carter
HSS231024
Tools for Historians of Science
Contributed Paper
Susanna Bloem
HSS567
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Dr. Sean Hsiang-lin Lei
HSS187
Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
Contributed Paper
Jiemin Tina Wei
141 visits